Sample Audit
We ran the public homepage of a local Chattanooga service business through the same lab tests we use in every audit (Google Lighthouse, mobile, October 2026). The business is not named and is not a client — this page shows how we read the numbers and what we would fix first.
Performance
52
out of 100
Accessibility
92
out of 100
Search (SEO)
85
out of 100
Best practices
100
out of 100
Lab results vary from run to run and by device; they show direction and size of the problem, not an exact guarantee.
01 / Critical
Outside scripts froze the page for about 2.3 seconds, and roughly 335 KB of code loads but is never used. On a phone, a visitor who taps “Call now” may get no response for several seconds. We would remove or delay non-essential widgets and trackers and load the rest only when needed.
02 / Critical
The largest element on screen took 4.4 seconds to show. Serving modern, correctly sized images (about 300 KB of savings found) and prioritizing the hero content brings this down sharply.
03 / High
The homepage has over 1,000 page elements and needs 8.7 seconds of phone processing work. A leaner build means faster loads and lower hosting cost.
04 / High
Some links have no readable name, some aren’t crawlable, and the robots.txt file has an error. These quietly limit how well Google understands the site and how usable it is with assistive technology.
05 / Medium
Headings skip levels and some elements use ARIA attributes that aren’t allowed. Small fixes, but they move the site toward WCAG 2.2 AA standards.